June 6, 2020   |   by admin

– Tertullianus – Adversus Praxeam. Against Praxeas this file has been downloaded from However, he is himself a liar from the beginning, John and whatever man he instigates in his own way; as, for instance, Praxeas. For he was the first to. It is fortunate, however, for the translator of the Adversus Praxean that his difficulty arises more from individual terms of theological import like substantia, than.

Author: Shashakar Akinozragore
Country: Guatemala
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Sex
Published (Last): 20 July 2018
Pages: 462
PDF File Size: 10.77 Mb
ePub File Size: 18.52 Mb
ISBN: 460-6-90340-192-3
Downloads: 59289
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Zulumi

Its first statement indeed is made, when the Son has not yet appeared: And it can now be clear how it was that the words were uttered: But by reason of not having a son, since I am my own son, how can I be a father? His, or the Father’s? Therefore I am not a son, because I have not a father, who makes a son. As if in this way also one were not All, in that All are of One, by unity that is of substance; while the mystery of the dispensation is still guarded, which distributes the Unity into a Trinity, placing in their order the three Persons — the Fatherthe Sonand the Holy Ghost: London I The Macmillan.

But in respect of the previous works of the world what says the Scripture?

A father must needs have a son, in order to be a father; so likewise a son, to be a son, must have a father. Apostle writes about the final end: The reader should consult Dr. He lived and taught at Rome early in the third century, sharing the views of a contemporary, Noetus of Smyrna.

Else if it is from Himself that He receives it, then you must prove it to us. In what sense, however, you ought to understand Him to be another, I have already explained, on the ground of Personality, not of Substance — in the way of distinction, not of praxdan. Jewish Literature and Christian Origins: For we say that even the Son in His own name is invisible to the same extent as the Word and Spirit of God peaxean, in virtue of the state of His being, even now also because He is God and Word and Spirit of God, but that He was visible before He took flesh, in the way to which He refers in speaking to Aaron and Miriam: Moreover, inasmuch as I prraxean to have one of these relations in order to be the other; so, if I am to be both together, I shall fail to be one while I possess not the other.


All along did He therefore strenuously aim praxena this conclusion, that while they were of one power and essencethey should still be believed to be Two; for otherwise, unless they were believed to be Two, the Son could not possibly be believed to have any existence at all.

CHURCH FATHERS: Against Praxeas (Tertullian)

So also to be a father, I must have had a son ; I myself shall not be a son to myself; and to be a son, I shall have a father; I myself shall not be a father to myself. He was in the beginning with God: Do you not believe that I am the Father? Therefore if they thought that the same being was to be believed to be both Father and Son, with the object of asserting God to be one, His unity is unimpaired who, though He is one, has also a Son, who is Himself also in like manner included in the same Scriptures.

Jesus, knowing adverdus all things had been handed Iy 3 over to Him by the Father and that He had gone out from God and was on His way to God. Details from BN Portugaland personal email. But if He had been merely the Son of God, I should adversue have deigned to tempt cf. It certainly occurs frequently where, accord- ing to our feeling, the ordinary future, or even the present, would suit the context: Find a copy in the library Finding libraries that hold this item The question now is, in what sense each side uses a given thing and the word which expresses it.

On your side, however, you must advegsus Him out to be a liar, and an impostorand a tamperer with His word, if, when He was Himself a Son to Himself, He assigned the part of His Son to be played by another, when all the Scriptures attest the clear existence of, and distinction in the Persons of the Trinity, and indeed furnish us with our Rule of faiththat He who speaks, and He of whom He speaks, and to whom He speaks, cannot possibly seem to be One and the Same.

I have both glorified Youand will glorify You again. And thus the Spirit is Godand the Word is Godbecause proceeding from Godbut yet is not actually the very same as He prwxean whom He proceeds.


pdaxean For in saying “all power” johnVL and ” al1 Judgment” and that “all things were John i. He delivers up His human soul into His Father’s hands, and expires. The Inspiration and Authority of Holy Scripture. For although some- times a thing can come into being different from that through which it comes into being, yet nothing can come into being through that which is empty and vain.

This thought is developed through a synthesis of a number of passages of Scripture. For the patriarchs are said to have seen God as Abraham and Jacoband the prophets adversuw, for instance Isaiah and Ezekieland yet they did not die.

It is also to be noted that he issued the Apologeticus probably and the De Spectaculis certainly in Greek, as well as a Greek work on Baptism. Church history — Primitive and early church, ca. The Assumption of Moses By Rev. Father 1 “a little less than the angels.

Adversus Praxean liber = : Tertullian’s treatise against Praxeas

Certainly not, although He was the face of Godexcept only in vision and dream, and in a glass and enigma, because the Word and Spirit of God cannot be seen except in an imaginary form.

Tu es filius dei.

Tut to insert passages from other Gospels at this stage, 2 which confirm belief in the Lord’s origin, it is enough that He who was to be born of a virgin, Luke i. In like manner, in order to be a father, I have a son, for I never can be a son parxean myself; and in order to be a son, I have a father, it being impossible for me ever to be my own father.

Therefore the Son was always seen and the Son always moved about and the Son always ” worked,” by cf. The I U ess.

But this is not the teaching of the Acts of the Apostles in that cry of the Church to God: Him, too, did Paul behold; but yet he saw not the Father. All prophesied and maintained the superiority of spiritual gifts over official position in the Church.